Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Neuropsychology Unit, Department of NeurologyChurchill Hospital, OxfordH. Eysenck and S. Eysenck's psychoticism (P) scale was appraised. Their claimsof continuity between psychosis and normality are based on a shifting conceptof continuity. At times, Eysenck and Eysenck appear to be arguing for a con-tinuum between psychosis and normality at the level of clinical symptoms. Onother occasions they seem to say that the P scale measures the underlying con-dition responsible for the psychotic symptoms. The evidence is not strong ineither case. If it were, then the P scale would be a useful diagnostic instrument.However, in their most recent work, Eysenck and Eysenck clearly state thatthe P scale measures the predisposition to psychosis, and that only a verysmall proportion of people with high P scores are likely to develop a psychosis(p. S). In this case, the P scale cannot be used alone as a diagnostic tool, sinceit does not discriminate the mentally ill from the healthy. The value of the Pscale therefore rests on its validity as a measure of predisposition to psychosis.It is shown that validation data presented by Eysenck and Eysenck are at bestunconvincing and, at worst, contrary to their hypothesis.
Dorothy Bishop (Fri,) studied this question.