Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The present study examined whether sexual minority adolescents in rural areas were significantly more distressed than their rural sexual majority peers. Additionally, the study examined the impact of level of school belonging, family belonging, and the presence of a mentoring relationship on affective distress for rural sexual minority adolescents and youth (N = 469). Findings indicated that rural adolescents who were sexual minorities reported higher levels of affective distress than their rural heterosexual counterparts. In examining rural sexual minorities alone, higher levels of school and family belonging were associated with lower levels of distress. A relationship was not found between level of distress and mentoring relationships. The importance of building networks of support for sexual minorities in rural areas is addressed.
Cohn et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: