This review summarizes the role of various imaging modalities in diagnosing pericardial effusion and highlights existing invasive and non-invasive therapies for its management.
This review summarizes current evidence supporting echocardiography for diagnosis and pericardiocentesis or pericardial window for the management of pericardial effusion.
The hemodynamic stability of the heart and pericardium are maintained by the pericardial fluid of volume ∼10-50 ml. Pericardial effusion is associated with the abnormal accumulation of pericardial fluid in the pericardial cavity. Numerous imaging techniques are utilized to evaluate pericardial effusion including chest X-ray, electrocardiogram, transthoracic echocardiography, computed tomography scan, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and pericardiocentesis. Once diagnosed, there are numerous treatment options available for the management of patients with pericardial effusion. These include various invasive and non-invasive strategies such as pericardiocentesis, pericardial window, and sclerosing therapies. In recent times, few studies have been conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of each approach in routine clinical practice. In this review, we review the role of different modalities in the diagnosis of pericardial effusion while highlighting existing therapies aimed at the management and treatment of pericardial effusion.
Yamani et al. (Sat,) conducted a review in Pericardial effusion. Diagnostic and therapeutic modalities was evaluated. This review summarizes the role of various imaging modalities in diagnosing pericardial effusion and highlights existing invasive and non-invasive therapies for its management.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: