Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
OBJECTIVE: We investigated patient perceptions of a virtual preoperative anaesthesia evaluation clinic linking Royal Darwin Hospital to Katherine Hospital. DESIGN: Descriptive study, cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Regional and rural areas of Northern Territory, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Sample includes 27 respondents, five Indigenous, 18 non-Indigenous and four unknown. INTERVENTIONS: Introduction of a preoperative anaesthesia evaluation clinic. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We designed a 10-item, 5-point Likert scale questionnaire assessing patient perceptions in four domains: (i) technical quality; (ii) perceived efficacy; (iii) affective patient experience; and (iv) patient preference. Qualitative responses are also reported. RESULTS: Twenty-seven out of 35 patients (77%) completed the questionnaire. Ninety-eight per cent were in positive agreement on technical quality with a mean score of 1.35 (SD: 0.53); Ninety-five per cent on perceived efficacy, 1.35 (SD: 0.65); Eighty-four per cent in negative agreement on affective patient experience (negative perception item), 4.19 (SD: 1.07); Eighty-one per cent in negative agreement on patient preference (negative perception item), 4.23 (SD: 1.14). There were no significant differences in the answers between Indigenous (five patients) and non-Indigenous patients (18 patients). CONCLUSION: Our study confirms the acceptability of telemedicine in the remote assessment of preoperative patients in the Northern Territory, with positive perceptions in all four domains.
Roberts et al. (Fri,) studied this question.