Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The Lalonde Report was published in 1974, and was the first significant government report to suggest that health care services were not the most important determinant of health. After reviewing the evidence, the report suggested that there were four “health fields”–lifestyle, environment, health care organization, human biology—and that major improvements in health would result primarily from improvements in lifestyle, environment and our knowledge of human biology. Lalonde also indicated a broad understanding of the determinants of health in subsequent speeches. While the report was greeted sympathetically at the time, it did not have all that significant an impact in Canada. It was criticised on a number of grounds, in particular that it paid too much attention to lifestyle and too little attention to environment. Furthermore, because health is a provincial responsibility in Canada, while the report was a federal report, there was no mechanism readily available to implement the recommendations of the report. The report was nonetheless widely hailed outside Canada, and similar (and often better) reports were published in Britain, the USA, Sweden and elsewhere. The report remains a highly regarded contribution to the transformation in thinking about health that has occurred in the past decade. Since the report was published, our models, concepts and thinking have advanced considerably. More sophisticated and comprehensive models of the determinants of health are available; national health goals and strategies have been developed in a number of countries; our concepts of health promotion have moved well beyond essentially “victim-blaming” lifestyle approaches to multi-faceted, community based approaches; there is increasing interest in the health implications of public policy in non-health policy sectors, and we have begun to articulate a more positive vision of health.
Trevor Hancock (Wed,) studied this question.