What are the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and safety of dofetilide in healthy volunteers?
Dofetilide demonstrates selective class III antiarrhythmic activity with dose-dependent QTc prolongation and high oral bioavailability in healthy volunteers.
The pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerance of the class III antiarrhythmic dofetilide (UK-68,798) were evaluated in two groups of healthy volunteers; first, single oral escalating doses (1, 2, 5, 7.5, and 10 μg/kg with random insertion of placebo) were administered in a double-blind manner and, second, its intravenous (0.5 mg) and oral (0.5 mg) administration were compared in an open two-way crossover design. Oral dofetilide from 5 (μg/kg produced significant dose-dependent prolongations of the QTc interval compared to placebo. Maximal mean QTc prolongations were 5 μg/kg, 29 ms (7%) at 2 h; 7.5 μg/kg, 35 ms (9%) at 6 h; and 10 μg/kg, 47 ms (12%). Following i.v. infusion of dofetilide (0.5 mg) (n = 9), the QTc interval significantly increased from 401 μ 26 to 504 μ 105 ms at the end of the infusion. One subject exhibited excessive prolongation of his QTc interval (451–808 ms) 5 min after the infusion, which was associated with an asymptomatic run (5 beats) of polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and several multifocal ventricular ectopic beats. Following oral administration of dofetilide (0.5 mg) (n = 9), the QTc interval increased significantly from 396 μ 27 ms to a maximum of 445 μ 27 ms at 2 μ 0.9 h postdosing. No changes occurred in PR intervals and QRS width. Small changes occurred in the heart rate and blood pressure. The plasma elimination half-lives of dofetilide were found to be 7.5 μ 0.4 (i.v.) and 7.1 μ 0.2 (oral) h; the volume of distribution was 228 μ 17 L; the clearance was 347 μ 20 ml/min; 52 μ 2% was recovered in the urine in the 48 h following dosing. The oral/i.v. bioavailability was 96% (range of 83–108%). Plasma concentrations of dofetilide increased in a dose-dependent manner. In conclusion, dofetilide has selective class HI activity with an acceptable hemodynamic and pharmacokinetic profile and warrants further evaluation in humans.
Tham et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: