What question did this study set out to answer?

This research explores the Hanafi school's rulings on adultery and theft, focusing on final judgments and their implications compared to other jurisprudential schools.

June 4, 2026Open Access

What is the ruling based on the outcome according to the Hanafi school in selected examples of issues of adultery and theft—a comparative jurisprudential study

Key Points

This research explores the Hanafi school's rulings on adultery and theft, focusing on final judgments and their implications compared to other jurisprudential schools.
Comparative analysis of rulings in Hanafi and other schools of jurisprudence
Evaluation of final judgment principles in cases of theft and adultery
Consideration of justice and public interest in law applications
Findings indicate that the Hanafi school prioritizes justice in its rulings on adultery and theft.
The outcomes reflect a balance between punishment and the rights of the harmed parties.
The study reveals that applying consequences can significantly alter original rulings.

Abstract

This research aims to study the application of the principle of the final judgment and to understand its results in matters of adultery and theft according to the Hanafi school of jurisprudence. It also aims to compare these applications with other schools of jurisprudence, and to determine whether these results lead to benefit or harm. It does not focus on the direct action of the person responsible, in order to avoid a hasty judgment that could deprive the person harmed of some or all of his rights, and also to avoid the consequences of The offender may be subjected to a punishment greater than his crime or offense, because the rule of consequence requires changing the original ruling to a ruling that may differ from it due to the consequences of the act. Or, according to the Hanafi school, changing the course of the ruling and the consequences of the action. This principle is considered important in cases of adultery and theft, where consideration is given to achieving justice and the public interest when applying penaltie

KI fragen

Bookmark

View Full Paper