The prospective commercial exploitation of polymetallic nodules in the International Seabed Area (“the Area”) poses complex legal, environmental, and ethical challenges. The governance framework established under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and administered by the International Seabed Authority (ISA) faces increasing pressure from emerging industrial interests, raising questions about its adequacy to ensure sustainable and equitable seabed activities. The research employs a multidisciplinary methodology that integrates legal and normative analysis of the UNCLOS regime with a technical review of current and emerging deep-sea mining technologies. Particular attention is given to the design and operation of collector vehicles and sediment re-injection systems, as well as to the regulatory instruments governing Sponsoring State responsibilities. The analysis reveals significant gaps in the existing normative structure, particularly in the definition and enforcement of State responsibility and in the ethical oversight of private contractors with prior operational risks. Furthermore, while technological advances claim to mitigate environmental damage, evidence indicates that current systems remain insufficient to prevent large-scale impacts, especially regarding the dispersion and persistence of sediment plumes in the water column. Without the adoption of robust, binding exploitation regulations and the compulsory implementation of the best available mitigation technologies, the environmental risks and governance uncertainties associated with deep-sea mining remain unacceptably high. Such deficiencies compromise the ecological integrity and long-term sustainability of abyssal ecosystems and may generate significant disputes concerning State responsibility under international law.
Charlo et al. (Mon,) studied this question.