Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition (HCCI) combustion has been widely reported to offer high efficiency and ultra-low nitrogen oxide emissions compared to conventional spark-ignited (SI) combustion. However, reported efficiency benefits strongly depend on boundary conditions, engine hardware, and the chosen reference concept. This study presents a systematic experimental comparison between HCCI and SI combustion using gasoline and ethanol on the same single-cylinder research engine under unthrottled and otherwise identical operating conditions. Combustion stability, indicated efficiency, combustion phasing, and gaseous emissions are evaluated. The results show that HCCI combustion provides substantially reduced CO (ethanol: −61.1%; gasoline: −80.6%) and NOx (ethanol: −96.1%; gasoline: −86.3%) emissions and superior combustion stability for both fuels. Ethanol further improves efficiency and emissions compared to gasoline. Contrary to common expectations reported in the literature, no universal efficiency advantage of HCCI combustion over SI operation is observed under the specific boundary conditions and with the investigated engine configuration of this study. A detailed loss analysis shows that, for the present setup, increased gas exchange and heat transfer losses offset the higher working cycle efficiency (without gas exchange) of HCCI combustion.
Schaber et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: