This study protocol describes a planned pilot randomized controlled trial to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a 7-session dyadic intervention for couples living with heart failure; no results are yet available.
RCT (n=120)
Open-label
Block randomization stratified by gender
No
Does the Taking Care of Us (TCU) dyadic intervention improve feasibility, acceptability, and dyadic health in couples living with heart failure compared to standard education?
This protocol outlines a pilot RCT to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a couple-based telehealth intervention for adults with heart failure and their partners.
BACKGROUND: There are more than 1 million hospital admissions and 3 million emergency visits for heart failure in the USA annually. Although spouse/partners make substantial contributions to the management of heart failure and experience poor health and high levels of care strain, they are rarely the focus of heart failure interventions. This protocol describes a pilot randomized controlled trial that tests the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary change in outcomes of a seven-session couple-based intervention called Taking Care of Us© (TCU). The TCU© intervention is grounded in the theory of dyadic illness management and was developed to promote collaborative illness management and better physical and mental health of adults with heart failure and their partners. METHODS: A two-arm randomized controlled trial will be conducted. Eligible adults with heart failure and their co-residing spouse/partner will be recruited from a clinical site in the USA and community/social media outreach and randomized to either the TCU© intervention or to a control condition (SUPPORT©) that offers education around heart failure management. The target sample is 60 couples (30 per arm). TCU© couples will receive seven sessions over 2 months via Zoom; SUPPORT© couples will receive three sessions over 2 months via Zoom. All participants will complete self-report measures at baseline (T1), post-treatment (T2), and 3 months post-treatment (T3). Acceptability and feasibility of the intervention will be examined using both closed-ended and open-ended questions as well as enrollment, retention, completion, and satisfaction metrics. Preliminary exploration of change in outcomes of TCU© on dyadic health, dyadic appraisal, and collaborative management will also be conducted. DISCUSSION: Theoretically driven, evidence-based dyadic interventions are needed to optimize the health of both members of the couple living with heart failure. Results from this study will provide important information about recruitment and retention and benefits and drawbacks of the TCU© program to directly inform any needed refinements of the program and decision to move to a main trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04737759) registered on 27 January 2021.
Lyons et al. (Mitttwoch) führten eine rct bei Herzinsuffizienz (n=120) durch. Taking Care of Us© (TCU) vs. SUPPORT© Bildungsberatung (drei Sitzungen über 2 Monate) wurde auf Durchführbarkeit und Akzeptanz der Intervention bewertet. Dieses Studienprotokoll beschreibt eine geplante pilotierte randomisierte kontrollierte Studie zur Bewertung der Durchführbarkeit und Akzeptanz einer 7-sitzigen dyadischen Intervention für Paare, die mit Herzinsuffizienz leben; es liegen noch keine Ergebnisse vor.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: