A Neural Network classifier achieved an accuracy rate of 99.8% for detecting PVC arrhythmias from ECG signals, compared to 94.87% for ANFIS and 97.57% for SVM classifiers.
Do Neural Network, ANFIS, and SVM classifiers accurately detect PVC arrhythmias from ECG signals?
A Neural Network classifier achieved a high accuracy of 99.8% for detecting PVC arrhythmias from ECG signals, outperforming ANFIS and SVM.
Premature Ventricular Contraction (PVC) beats are of great importance in evaluating and predicting life threatening ventricular arrhythmias. The aim of this study is to improve the diagnosis level of detection of PVC arrhythmia from ECG signals. This improvement is based on an appropriate choice of features for the selected task. We extracted fourteen features including, temporal, morphological features from MIT/BIH ECG signals database and then applying LDA algorithm, we reduced them into nine features. Finally we use a Neural Network, an ANFIS, and a SVM as classifiers. Satisfactory result obtained with accuracy rates of 99.8% for Neural Network classifier, 94.8673% for ANFIS classifier, and 97.57 for SVM classifier.
Gharaviri et al. (Tue,) conducted a other in Premature Ventricular Contraction (PVC) arrhythmia. Neural Network classifier vs. ANFIS and SVM classifiers was evaluated on Accuracy rate of PVC arrhythmia detection. A Neural Network classifier achieved an accuracy rate of 99.8% for detecting PVC arrhythmias from ECG signals, compared to 94.87% for ANFIS and 97.57% for SVM classifiers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: