Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
We propose a novel way to incorporate expert knowledge into the training of deep neural networks. Many approaches encode domain constraints directly into the network architecture, requiring non-trivial or domain-specific engineering. In contrast, our approach, called MultiplexNet, represents domain knowledge as a quantifier-free logical formula in disjunctive normal form (DNF) which is easy to encode and to elicit from human experts. It introduces a latent Categorical variable that learns to choose which constraint term optimizes the error function of the network and it compiles the constraints directly into the output of existing learning algorithms. We demonstrate the efficacy of this approach empirically on several classical deep learning tasks, such as density estimation and classification in both supervised and unsupervised settings where prior knowledge about the domains was expressed as logical constraints. Our results show that the MultiplexNet approach learned to approximate unknown distributions well, often requiring fewer data samples than the alternative approaches. In some cases, MultiplexNet finds better solutions than the baselines; or solutions that could not be achieved with the alternative approaches. Our contribution is in encoding domain knowledge in a way that facilitates inference. We specifically focus on quantifier-free logical formulae that are specified over the output domain of a network. We show that this approach is both efficient and general; and critically, our approach guarantees 100% constraint satisfaction in a network's output.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Nick Hoernle
University of Edinburgh
Rafael Michael Karampatsis
University of Edinburgh
Vaishak Belle
Turing Institute
University of Edinburgh
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
The Alan Turing Institute
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hoernle et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a21702e4f27a676ef8b6faa — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v36i5.20512
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: