Socioeconomic Variation in Asthma Hospitalization: Excess Utilization or Greater Need?

OBJECTIVE: To assess the hypothesis that higher incidence of severe acute asthma exacerbation, not lower severity threshold for admission, explains the difference between the asthma hospitalization rates of inner-city and suburban children. METHODS: All 2028 asthma hospitalizations between 1991 and 1995 for children (aged >1 month and /=95%), moderate (90%-94%), and severe (<90%) admissions constituted 10.3%, 41.9%, and 47.7% of all hospitalizations, respectively. Although rates within the community followed a distinct geographic pattern of suburban (1.05/1000 child-years) < other urban (2.99/1000 child-years) < inner-city (5.21/1000 child-years), the proportions of admissions with low severity did not vary among areas. Likewise, the proportions of admissions that were severe (SaO2 <90%) were not significantly different (44.8, 45.7, and 52.1% for suburban, other urban, and inner-city areas, respectively). The distributions of asthma severity, measured by the duration of frequent nebulized bronchodilator treatments and the length of hospital stay, were also similar among children from different socioeconomic areas. CONCLUSION: The marked socioeconomic and racial disparity in Rochester's asthma hospitalization rates is largely attributable to higher incidence of severe acute asthma exacerbations among inner-city children; it signals greater need, not excess utilization. Both adverse environmental conditions and lower quality primary care might explain the higher incidence. Interventions directed at the environment offer the possibility of primary prevention, whereas primary care directed at asthma is focused on secondary prevention, principally on improved medication use. Higher hospitalization rates cannot be assumed to identify opportunities for cost reduction. The extent to which our observations about asthma hold true under other conditions and in other communities warrants systematic attention. Knowledge of when higher rates signal excess utilization and when, instead, they signify greater needs should guide equitable national health policy.