An echocardiographic formula accurately predicted the optimal atrioventricular delay compared to invasive measurements of cardiac output (r=0.93, P<0.0001) and wedge pressure (r=0.95, P<0.0001).
15 patients (mean age 70.3 years) with an implanted DDD pacemaker undergoing acute hemodynamic and echocardiographic evaluation.
Echocardiographic formula for predicting optimal AV delay vs Invasive measurement of optimal AV delay (CO and PCWP)
Correlation between predicted and invasively measured optimal AV delay — r = 0.93 to 0.95, p=<0.0001
Effect estimate: r = 0.93 to 0.95
p-value: p=<0.0001
In patients with an implanted DDD pacemaker (PM), the atrial contribution may be interrupted by too short an atrioventricular (AV) delay, and filling time may be shortened by too long an AV delay. The AV delay at which the end of the A wave on transmitral flow coincides with complete closure of the mitral valve may be optimal. The subjects were 15 patients 70.3+/-12.3 (SD) years old with an implanted DDD PM. Cardiac output (CO) and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) were measured by Swan-Ganz catheter. Transmitral flow was recorded by pulsed Doppler echocardiography. AV delay was prolonged stepwise by 25 msc. When the AV delay was set at 155+/-26 ms, the end of the A wave coincided with complete closure of the mitral valve. When the AV delay was prolonged 25, 50, 75, and 100 ms from this AV delay, the interval between the end of the A wave and complete closure of mitral the valve was prolonged 16+/-5, 39+/-6, 65+/-4 and 88+/-5 ms, respectively (r = 0.97, P<0.0001) and diastolic mitral regurgitation was observed during this period. Thus, the optimal AV delay may be predicted as follows: the slightly prolonged AV delay minus the interval between the end of the A wave and complete closure of the mitral valve. When the AV delay was set at 215 ms, there was a significant positive correlation between the predicted optimal AV delay (166+/-23 ms) and the optimal AV delay (CO: 161+/-26 msec, r = 0.93, P<0.0001, PCWP: 161+/-28 msec, r = 0.95, P<0.0001). In conclusion, optimal AV delay can be predicted by this simple formula: slightly prolonged AV delay minus the interval between end of A wave and complete closure of mitral valve at the AV delay setting.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Toshiyuki Ishikawa
Tokyo Metropolitan Matsuzawa Hospital
Shinichi Sumita
Sapporo Medical University
Kazuo Kimura
Interventional Cardiology
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Yokohama City University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ishikawa et al. (Wed,) conducted a other in Implanted DDD pacemaker (n=15). Echocardiographic formula for predicting optimal AV delay vs. Invasive measurement of optimal AV delay (CO and PCWP) was evaluated on Correlation between predicted and invasively measured optimal AV delay (r = 0.93 to 0.95, p=<0.0001). An echocardiographic formula accurately predicted the optimal atrioventricular delay compared to invasive measurements of cardiac output (r=0.93, P<0.0001) and wedge pressure (r=0.95, P<0.0001).
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a229147b65eef78bdffa30a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1999.tb00630.x
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: