In a conscious sheep model, glibenclamide infusion had a high proarrhythmic action (ASI 143 vs control 54, P<0.001) and detrimental effects on regional systolic and diastolic function.
Does glibenclamide affect postischemic myocardial functional recovery and reperfusion-induced arrhythmias in a conscious sheep model?
Glibenclamide exerts proarrhythmic effects and impairs myocardial functional recovery following ischemia-reperfusion in a conscious sheep model, potentially explaining the cardiovascular risk associated with sulfonylureas.
Absolute Event Rate: 143% vs 54%
p-value: p=<0.001
INTRODUCTION: Sulfonylureas have been associated with a high incidence of cardiovascular death in diabetic patients treated with these drugs. Although the evidence on the cardiovascular effects of sulfonylureas is contradictory and scarce, many experiments have shown that the second-generation compound glibenclamide has a protective effect on mechanical function and against generation of malignant arrhythmias. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess whether glibenclamide elicits protection on postischemic myocardial functional recovery (stunning) and against reperfusion-induced arrhythmias in a conscious sheep model. METHODS: Sheep were divided into three groups: control, glibenclamide (0.4 mg/kg) and vehicle. After a 12-min ischemic period, the heart was reperfused and recordings for index calculation were acquired during 2 h of reperfusion. Percent systolic wall thickening fraction (%WTH), radial diastolic compliance (CR), arrhythmia incidence and Bernauer's arrhythmia severity index (ASI) were calculated for each group. RESULTS: Glibenclamide infusion had a high proarrhythmic action (ASI: glibenclamide 143, control 54 and vehicle 23; ANOVA P < 0.001 drug vs. control and vehicle) and a detrimental effect on regional systolic (%WTH: glibenclamide 26.9 +/- 6.7, control 65.7 +/- 3.5 and vehicle 68.6 +/- 5.6, ANOVA P < 0.01 drug vs. control and vehicle) and diastolic function (CR: glibenclamide 76.2 +/- 7.8, control 104.7 +/- 4.2 and vehicle 106 +/- 4.9, ANOVA P < 0.05 drug vs. control and vehicle) during reperfusion. CONCLUSIONS: Glibenclamide infusion resulted in adverse cardiovascular effects. The combined deleterious effects on reperfusion-induced arrhythmias and on myocardial recovery from stunning could be the cause of the unexplained high mortality in diabetic patients treated with sulfonylurea derivatives. The mechanism involved seems to be the blockade of the cardiac ATP sensitive potassium (K-ATP) channel.
Héctor F. del Valle (Fri,) conducted a other in Postischemic myocardial functional recovery (stunning) and reperfusion-induced arrhythmias. Glibenclamide vs. Control and vehicle was evaluated on Arrhythmia severity index (ASI) (p=<0.001). In a conscious sheep model, glibenclamide infusion had a high proarrhythmic action (ASI 143 vs control 54, P<0.001) and detrimental effects on regional systolic and diastolic function.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: