Abstract Introduction Sexual functioning arises from a dynamic interplay of biological, psychological, and relational determinants. Attachment theory provides a well-established framework for understanding individual variability in intimacy and sexual health. Avoidant and anxious attachment have been identified as critical risk factors for sexual dysfunction, yet gender-specific manifestations and age-related interactions remain underexplored. Objectives This study aimed to investigate the influence of attachment dimensions and age on sexual functioning in adult men and women, with a focus on identifying gender-specific and age-related interaction effects. Methods Adult men and women completed validated measures of sexual functioning (FSFI/IIEF) and attachment (anxiety, avoidance), as well as a sociodemographic questionnaire. Separate linear regression analyses by gender evaluated main and interaction effects of age and attachment on sexual functioning outcomes. Results Avoidant attachment emerged as the most robust predictor of impaired sexual functioning. In women, higher avoidance was linked to significant difficulties in orgasm, sexual satisfaction, lubrication, and pain. Notably, older women with elevated avoidance reported the most pronounced lubrication and pain impairments. In men, avoidance predicted lower overall sexual functioning and satisfaction, with older men with high avoidance exhibiting the greatest deficits. Attachment anxiety did not emerge as a significant predictor, and no significant interaction effects with age were observed. Conclusions These findings underscore the clinical significance of avoidant attachment in evaluating and treating sexual dysfunction, particularly in later adulthood. Gender-specific patterns indicate that women experience multidomain impairments, whereas men primarily report global declines in functioning and satisfaction. Incorporating attachment-informed strategies into clinical interventions may enhance therapeutic outcomes and provide targeted support for individuals at risk across the lifespan. Disclosure No
Orel et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: