Heart rate variability biofeedback was associated with declines in perceived stress, anxiety, and depression (p < 0.001; d≈1.28-1.86), although between-group differences converged.
Observational (n=47)
Does heart rate variability biofeedback improve psychological outcomes and autonomic adaptation in students in a high-stress academic environment?
Heart rate variability biofeedback is associated with improvements in stress, anxiety, and depression in medical students, though definitive attribution is limited by the lack of randomization and sham control.
Effect estimate: d≈1.28-1.86
p-value: p=< 0.001
Medical education is a high-demand environment where stress may disrupt autonomic and HPA-axis regulation. We examined symptom trajectories and adaptation during heart rate variability biofeedback (HRV-BF) in an academic setting. Forty-seven students were followed for ~3 months. The intervention group completed HRV-BF twice weekly (~30 min/session). Psychological outcomes (PSS, SAS, BAI, BDI) were assessed at baseline and follow-up, with clinically meaningful improvement defined as a ≥ 20% reduction. HRV/coherence indices were analyzed with mixed-effects models, and cortisol and secretory IgA were measured around Maastricht Acute Stress Test before and after training. Within the HRV-BF group, perceived stress, anxiety, and depression declined by May (all p < 0.001; d≈1.28-1.86), although between-group differences converged. Meaningful improvement was more frequent in HRV-BF group across scales. Acute sessions increased coherence and inter-beat interval and reduced heart rate (p ≤ 0.015), while RMSSD and inter-beat interval gains plateaued after ~14 sessions. Cortisol responses to stress differed after training, whereas sIgA showed no between-group effects. In this nonrandomized study, HRV-BF was associated with clinically meaningful improvement by follow-up and autonomic adaptation; however, because the group was not matched on baseline distress severity and no sham comparator was used, reductions in anxiety and depression cannot be attributed definitively to the intervention.
Panayotova et al. (Mon,) conducted a observational in High-stress academic environments (n=47). Heart rate variability biofeedback (HRV-BF) vs. Control group (no sham) was evaluated on Perceived stress, anxiety, and depression (d≈1.28-1.86, p=< 0.001). Heart rate variability biofeedback was associated with declines in perceived stress, anxiety, and depression (p < 0.001; d≈1.28-1.86), although between-group differences converged.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: