Abstract As generative Artificial Intelligence achieves unprecedented levels of linguistic sophistication, the traditional boundaries of literary authorship are undergoing a profound “semantic devaluation.” This article examines Jack McDevitt’s 2005 short story, Henry James, This One’s for You , as a prophetic work of critical design fiction that anticipates the contemporary “science friction” between algorithmic output and human creative integrity. Central to this tension is the subversion of the Jamesian axiom – the principle that the “deepest quality of a work of art will always be the mind of the producer” (James 1934. The art of the novel: Critical prefaces . Richard P. Blackmur (ed.). New York: Scribner’s: 21). Adopting a semiotic lens, the study explores the crisis of the “hollow signifier,” where AI-generated prose mimics the “solidity of specification” of a masterpiece while lacking a lived human referent. Utilizing Jeffries’ (2010. Opposition in discourse . London: Continuum) framework of oppositional discourse, the study analyzes how the narrative’s diegetic prototype – the AI “Max” – constructs a binary between the autonomous machine and the Jamesian “Mind of the Producer.” The article argues that McDevitt’s work functions as a “probability adjustment,” exposing the violent erasure required to maintain the myth of the “lone human genius.” Ultimately, AI’s lack of sentient origin produces a semiotic collapse that institutional guardrails struggle to contain.
Zaghloul et al. (Fri,) studied this question.