Abstract Purpose: Accurate needle tracking is critical for the success of computed tomography (CT) -guided interventions, where even minor deviations may compromise procedural safety and clinical outcomes. However, existing image-guided tracking systems typically lack mechanisms to quantify and communicate the reliability of their predictions in real time, leaving clinicians to act on guidance of uncertain trustworthiness. Methods: We propose a Dynamic Uncertainty Level Assessment Framework that provides a quantitative, real-time estimate of tracking reliability by linearly linking a predicted uncertainty score to spatial tracking error. The framework consists of three different approaches: (1) a classic method based on dynamically weighted, interpretable reliability metrics; (2) a lightweight convolutional neural network (CNN) that predicts uncertainty directly from multi-view image data; and (3) a hybrid CNN that adaptively optimizes metric weights while preserving interpretability. The uncertainty level is defined on a fixed scale, with 0\% 0 % corresponding to ideal tracking (error of 0 mm) and 100\% 100 % to a tracking error of 10 mm. Results: Experimental validation on clinical and clinically realistic laboratory datasets of ∼ 30, 000 frames demonstrates a strong positive correlation between uncertainty and error (Pearson r > 0. 82 r > 0. 82) and achieves a stable tracking error estimation (error difference 0. 6 mm) with real-time performance (5 ms per frame). Conclusion: By enabling an intuitive uncertainty-to-error mapping, the proposed framework supports more informed intra-procedural decision-making, enhances operator trust in guidance data, and establishes a practical basis for integration into uncertainty-aware CT-guided intervention systems.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Max Steiger
Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Mohammad Rezapourian
Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Marko Rak
University Hospital Magdeburg
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Steiger et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a250ce97def13d035e1d1eb — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-026-03725-w