Papers 16 of the Constructibility series established collapse boundaries, early warning signals, proxy estimation, multi-agent dynamics, zero-shot deployment monitoring, and dynamic resource trajectories. Each paper characterised proximity to collapse via the margin M(t). None addressed the fundamentally dierent question of time-to-failure: how long will the system remain constructible, and how urgently should an operator intervene? We introduce Constructibility Survival Theory (CST), connecting the margin to survival analysis. The hazard rate of collapse at time t is modelled as: λ(t|M(t),˙M(t)) = λ0(t) exp−βMM(t) + β˙M˙M(t), (1)a proportional hazards (Cox) model where M(t) is a time-varying protective covariate and M(t) is a risk covariate. Three theoretical results: (1) survival function and expected safe lifetime; (2) monotone hazard ordering theorem; (3) optimal intervention timing. Validated on 6 real longitudinal datasets. Concordance index C = 0.82 ±0.04.
Karimov et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: