Magnitude alone fails to capture the full complexity of pavement roughness; its spatial distribution along a road is equally vital for effective maintenance planning. While traditional assessment has long relied on specialized survey vehicles, the rise of mobile crowdsensing now allows for massive data acquisition via smartphone sensors. This study investigates the spatial structure of pavement roughness using crowdsensed data from the SmartRoadSense platform. Roughness is quantified through the Power of Prediction Error (PPE) indicator derived from smartphone accelerometer signals. The dataset consists of 475 observations sampled at 20 m intervals over approximately 9.5 km of the A3/E45 motorway in southern Italy. A multi-scale spatial–statistical framework is adopted to analyse the roughness signal. The analysis includes the evaluation of scale-dependent statistical descriptors (mean and coefficient of variation), as well as spatial correlation, spectral, and entropy-based measures. The results indicate a short spatial correlation length (approximately 60–100 m) and the absence of a dominant spatial wavelength, suggesting that pavement roughness behaves as a localized multiscale process. A complementary segmentation analysis based on Classification and Regression Trees (CART) is performed to explore the spatial partitioning of the roughness signal. Our analysis indicates that segmentation complexity spikes once the minimum node size drops below roughly 10 observations. This trend points to the existence of localized irregularities that coarser scales simply overlook. Ultimately, these results suggest that mean roughness values alone are insufficient for describing pavement condition and that hybrid spatial–statistical approaches may support more scalable, data-driven, and spatially targeted pavement monitoring strategies for sustainable transportation infrastructure management.
Abbondati et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: