Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Whereas terminological recommendations require authors to use mean intensity or mean abundance to quantify parasites in a sample of hosts, awkward statistical limitations also force them to use either the median or the geometric mean of these measures when making comparisons across different samples. Here, we propose to reconsider this inconsistent practice by giving priority to biological realism in the interpretation of different statistical descriptors and choosing the statistical tools appropriate to our decisions. Prevalence, mean intensity, and indices of parasite distribution (such as median intensity) are suitable descriptors to quantify parasites in a sample of hosts. These measures have different biological interpretations and need different statistical methods to be compared between samples.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Rózsa et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a290750f95f9bb4b39febdc — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1645/0022-3395(2000)086[0228:qpisoh]2.0.co;2
Lajos Rózsa
Jenő Reiczigel
University of Veterinary Medicine
Gábor Majoros
Journal of Parasitology
University of Pannonia
Veszprémi Érseki Hittudományi Fõiskola
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...