Distributed seismic sensor networks integrated into the Internet of Things (IoT) infrastructure enable continuous condition monitoring of large-scale engineering structures. During long-term operation, however, measurement channels are subject to sensitivity drift, increased noise, and pulse artifacts that statistically mimic real vibration events. Related deep-learning techniques for noisy and ill-posed inverse problems have demonstrated the value of combining principled physical priors with deep models. Although the application domain differs, the underlying methodological insight—that constrained, physics-aware feature mappings can stabilize learning under noisy and partially observed conditions—directly motivates the use of a parameterized quantum circuit as a nonlinear feature transformer in the present work, where Hilbert space mapping serves as an analogous structural prior for the latent representation. Three principal fault modes are considered in this work, corresponding to the dominant degradation mechanisms observed in long-term seismic instrumentation: sensor drift, increased noise, and sensor failure. Each fault mode produces a distinct signature in the windowed feature space; the proposed model is trained to discriminate between them based on the latent CNN-LSTM-VQC representation. We propose a hybrid quantum-inspired deep-learning model (QC-DL) for the detection and diagnosis of channel-degradation anomalies. The architecture combines a 1D-CNN+LSTM feature extractor with a parameterized variational quantum circuit (VQC) used as a nonlinear feature transformer. All quantum experiments were performed on the QPanda3 CPUQVM simulator. The data were split chronologically prior to windowing to avoid information leakage. On real-world labeled accelerometric data with four operating modes (normal/drift/high-noise/failure), the QC-DL model achieved a macro-averaged F1 score of approximately 0.69 and per-class AUC values in the range 0.88–0.99. The mean early-detection latency was 1.6 s versus 2.1 s for the CNN-LSTM baseline (~24% reduction). An ablation study against a parameter-matched classical MLP showed that the gain is modest and not solely attributable to additional nonlinearity. The reported p-values (p = 0.70, p = 0.29) do not establish statistical significance. The results support the feasibility of hybrid quantum-inspired deep learning for sensor-channel verification, while highlighting the need for evaluation on real NISQ hardware. This paper proposes a hybrid quantum-inspired approach for detecting and diagnosing such anomalies in the time series of distributed seismic networks. The architecture combines a classical temporal feature extraction module based on one-dimensional convolutional layers and a recurrent long short-term memory (LSTM) network, which generates a latent window representation of the signal, with a parameterized variational quantum circuit used as a nonlinear feature processor in a hybrid computational circuit. Experimental validation was performed on real-world labeled data with multiple sensor degradation modes. The evaluation was organized in a scoring framework aligned with autonomous operation through window ranking and threshold alarm generation. In the experiments, the proposed model provided a macro-averaged F1 score of approximately 0.69 and area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curve values in the range of 0.88–0.99 across classes, outperforming baseline deep models. The average early detection latency was 1.6 s versus 2.1 s for the baseline recurrent model (a 24% reduction). An ablative comparison with a control model based on a classical multilayer perceptron of comparable dimension confirmed that the improvement is not limited to the addition of additional nonlinearity. The obtained results indicate the potential of quantum-supported deep learning for improving the reliability of long-term vibration monitoring and verifying the correctness of sensor channels in distributed seismic networks.
Bykov et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: