In the ever-evolving digital age, the boundaries of personal space and safety have been dramatically redefined. The internet, while serving as a powerful tool for communication, commerce, and information sharing, has simultaneously become a breeding ground for various forms of cybercrime. Among these, cyberstalking emerges as a particularly insidious threat. Unlike traditional stalking, which is physically observable and limited by geography, cyberstalking enables perpetrators to intrude into the personal lives of victims relentlessly, anonymously, and from any location across the globe. This study undertakes a comprehensive examination of cyberstalking, focusing on its legal, forensic, and investigative dimensions, to provide a multi-disciplinary understanding of how digital predators operate and how they can be effectively tracked and prosecuted. Cyberstalking is defined as the repeated use of electronic communication tools to harass, threaten, or intimidate an individual, group, or organization. The phenomenon often involves the use of emails, social media platforms, GPS tracking, instant messaging apps, and even sophisticated spyware or malware. Victims may suffer from psychological trauma, including anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress, and may also face reputational damage, social withdrawal, and economic losses. The anonymity afforded by digital platforms emboldens offenders, who exploit loopholes in privacy settings and data-sharing practices to track and manipulate their targets. Consequently, cyberstalking presents complex challenges to victims, law enforcement agencies, and legal practitioners alike. From a legal standpoint, cyberstalking occupies a unique position at the intersection of privacy rights, freedom of speech, and digital surveillance. This study delves into the legislative frameworks across multiple jurisdictions, with an emphasis on Indian cyber law as codified in the Information Technology Act, 2000 (with subsequent amendments), and relevant sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). It compares Indian legal provisions with international statutes such as the United States’ Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), the UK’s Protection from Harassment Act, and Australia's Online Safety Act. The comparative legal analysis identifies key gaps, strengths, and areas requiring reform in cyberstalking legislation, particularly in addressing cross-border jurisdictional issues, procedural delays, and victim protection mechanisms. The study advocates for a harmonized international legal approach and robust victim support infrastructure.
Anilkumar et al. (Tue,) studied this question.