This paper formally establishes, under the Conceptual Prime axioms, that the computational universe is governed by a single unifying law: the Conceptual Primes. Seven interlocking theorems are established across complexity theory, epistemology, information compression, evolutionary biology, temporal system dynamics, artificial intelligence architecture, and the unsimulability of reality. Theorem 1 (Reality-Complexity Equivalence) establishes that stable complexity is bounded by the weakest Prime — P̂ (S) = minᵢ Pᵢ (S) — and collapses to zero if any Prime is violated. Theorem 2 (Prime-Tractability) demonstrates that NP-Hard problems are intractable only in the purely abstract domain and become tractable at O (N²/K) effective complexity when solved by Prime-compliant algorithms grounded in physical reality. Theorem 3 (Conciseness Standard) proves that C (R) is the unique universal metric for lossless knowledge compression. Theorem 4 (Knowledge Accumulation Law) establishes that knowledge grows if and only if new information reduces total system entropy, incorporating the CAKI metric and the D (Ω) Defect Function as formal measures. Theorem 5 (Gödel's Ceiling) connects formal mathematical limits to biological evolution and AI scaling. Theorem 6 (Cardinal Value Lemmas) formalises Wisdom, Peace, Creativity, and Evolving Order as temporal combinations of the Primes, deriving the Prime-Base Intelligence corollary. Theorem 7 (Unsimulability of Reality) proves that no finite simulation can contain the live Prime-combination law of actualisation — Consciousness is the unique bridge between infinite potential and finite territory. The framework defines a two-stage computational architecture: a Training Evaluation Form (5-term Prime-resolved C (R) + CAKI) for grounding knowledge in Prime compliance and calibrating domain-dependent λ-weights, and an Inference Selection Form (3-term operational C (R) ) for selecting minimum-cost outputs. Dynamic λ-adaptation connects both stages, enabling domain-calibrated intelligence.
Mohamed Noureldin (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: