The research is motivated by the existing dichotomy between salafi pesantren (Islamic boarding school), which emphasize mastery of classical linguistic sciences (nahwu-sharaf) and deep understanding of traditional Islamic texts (turath), and modern pesantren, which prioritize communicative competence and the use of digital learning technologies. This study aims to analyze the dynamics, patterns, and epistemological integration of Arabic language learning practices within the Salafi–modern pesantren context. Through this analytical approach, the research seeks to identify the structural relationships, pedagogical transformations, and collaborative mechanisms that shape the contemporary Arabic language learning system in pesantren. This study employed a descriptive qualitative approach and a multi-case study design across three representative Salafi–Modern pesantren. Data were collected through observations of the learning process, in-depth interviews with teachers and students, as well as document analysis of curricula, instructional materials, and institutional policies related to Arabic language learning. The findings reveal three key strategies in the revitalization process; the integration of turats and modernity, methodological innovation that combines grammatical and communicative approaches, and the creation of a collaborative bi’ah lughawiyyah. From these findings, the study formulates the Integrative Model of al-Lughah al-Hayat, which positions Arabic not merely as a subject but as an instrument for spiritual, academic, and social development. The model blends traditional methods with modern techniques. The study contributes theoretically by reframing Arabic learning in pesantren as an epistemological integration process rather than a pedagogical dichotomy. Practically, it provides an analytical framework for designing collaborative Arabic curricula that balance textual scholarship and communicative competence in Islamic educational institutions.
Ruhendi et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: