Abstract The sanction structure of the income tax system of the United States involves two primary elements: risk of detection and magnitude of penalty. Either element may be varied to alter the expected cost of tax evasion. The government has changed both elements: with little explicit recognition of the behavioral implications of such changes. This paper develops a hypothesis based on Kahneman and Tversky's prospect theory with respect to the sensitivity of individuals toward risk of detection versus magnitude of penalty. The results of a laboratory experiment designed to test the hypothesis are reported. The experiment provides evidence that the magnigtude of a penalty should be more closely examined as a component in the tax evasion sanction structure. The implications of these findings on the structure of future research also are discussed.
Jackson et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: