Abstract The recent Statement on Auditing Standards No. 31, "Evidential Matter," stresses the importance of selecting effective and efficient audit procedures. However, a systematic, operational process for evaluating evidence alternatives is not offered in the auditing literature. In response, this paper introduces a research approach for assessing evidential competency based upon concepts of measurement and scientific research. The paper begins with an overview of the literature on evidence evaluation. A research approach to this problem is then presented as a framework for empirical testing. An illustration of the approach is also provided. Finally, applications of the proposed research approach are discussed.
Mock et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: