In current Eastern European construction practice, trapezoidal sheet roof cladding systems are predominantly fastened to the primary structure on two sides only. This paper presents a comprehensive experimental investigation of two-side fastened trapezoidal sheet roof diaphragms, with particular attention to the diaphragm-to-rafter connection. A total of 20 full-scale panel assemblies were tested under monotonic in-plane loading, and their behaviour was evaluated primarily from a serviceability limit state perspective, considering the diaphragm and its components as integral parts of the supporting structure. The results show that two-side fastened trapezoidal sheet diaphragms exhibit early non-linear behaviour, characterised by progressive degradation of panel stiffness. At the load level corresponding to 60% of the diaphragm shear capacity, the panel flexibility may increase by more than 230% compared with its initial value. Despite this progressive flexibility increase, the diaphragm still provides a substantial stiffening effect, reducing the flexibility by approximately 68–94% compared with the bare frame-purlin arrangement. Based on the experimental observations, a more restrictive serviceability displacement limit in the range of frame spacing/250 to frame spacing/300 is proposed for two-side fastened roof diaphragms with profiled metal sheets, intended to maintain elastic behaviour of the cladding components. Comparison of the diaphragm tests with the corresponding lap-joint component tests reveals that the loading conditions in the sheet-to-purlin fasteners within the diaphragm deviate from the pure shear conditions assumed in lap-joint testing. This behaviour results from the combined action of shear and tension arising from the deformation of the purlin web and outer flange.
Lőrincz et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: