Abstract The partition of British India in 1947 represents one of the most significant political transformations of the twentieth century. The division resulted in the creation of two sovereign states, India and Pakistan, marking the end of British colonial rule while simultaneously generating profound political, social, and humanitarian consequences. Although partition is frequently interpreted primarily as a religious conflict between Hindus and Muslims, it may also be understood through the lens of secessionism and self-determination. The demand for Pakistan, led by Muhammad Ali Jinnah and the All-India Muslim League, reflected concerns regarding Muslim political representation and the preservation of a distinct religious and cultural identity within a future independent India. At the same time, leaders such as Mahatma Gandhi advocated a united and secular state in which diverse religious communities could coexist peacefully. This article examines the partition of British India as a case study of secession and state formation. Drawing upon historical and political science literature, it analyzes the interplay of colonial policies, religious identities, nationalist movements, and geopolitical considerations that contributed to the division of the subcontinent. Particular attention is paid to the role of British colonial governance, the Two-Nation Theory, and the emergence of competing visions of political sovereignty. The article also explores the long-term consequences of partition, including the Kashmir conflict and the enduring rivalry between India and Pakistan. Finally, the study compares the partition of British India with contemporary movements for self-determination, including Catalonia, Scotland, and the Hungarian minority in Romania, highlighting both similarities and significant differences. Through this comparative perspective, the article contributes to broader debates concerning secession, separatism, nationalism, and state formation.
Abdulhamid Najafi (Thu,) studied this question.