Eight verified quantum computing jobs executed on IBM Quantum hardware (ibmfez Heron R2, 156 qubits; ibmₜorino Eagle R1, 133 qubits) between January 27 and March 15, 2026. User ID: IBMid-692001DJRD. Experiments include: 1. Bell State Entanglement — 96. 3% fidelity on ibmfez Heron R2 (Concurrence C = 0. 926, Tangle T = 0. 858, 1, 000 shots). Cross-platform benchmark: Heron R2 vs Eagle R1 (+8. 3 pp fidelity advantage, noise ratio 2. 43×). 2. Reproducibility Test — Two independent runs of identical circuit (χ² = 2. 70, p = 0. 44, df = 3). H₀ not rejected: statistically indistinguishable results at 95% confidence. 3. BB84 Quantum Key Distribution — Full Alice/Eve/Bob protocol implementation. Alice baseline error 0. 60% → Bob QBER 49. 0% under eavesdropping (82× degradation). Experimental demonstration of the quantum no-cloning theorem. Control group design isolates eavesdropper signal from hardware noise baseline. 4. Variational Quantum Circuit (VQC) — 2-qubit circuit, 10 trained parameters with tied weights (θ₃ = θ₄), 8 CZ gates in 4 entangling layers. 4-qubit ansatz: Shannon entropy 3. 885/4. 000 bits (97. 1%), ground-state bias confirmed (χ² = 300. 94, p ≈ 0). 5. Quantum Random Number Generation (QRNG) — 8-bit outputs, 10/10 unique values per shot (range 16–254). Total: 39, 010 quantum measurements across 8 jobs and 10 circuits. QPU time: 4. 8 seconds. Job completion rate: 100%. All results decoded from raw IBM SamplerV2 BitArray binary archives (zlib + base64 + NumPy. npy pipeline). No simulations. Statistical validation applied throughout (Wilson 95% CIs, chi-squared tests). Stack: Qiskit Runtime SamplerV2 · QPY · OpenQASM 2. 0 · Python · NumPy · SciPy Repository: https: //github. com/dinohatibovicWhitepaper: https: //dinohatibovic. github. io (Doc QAI-WP-2026-01-28-V4)
Dino Hatibovic (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: