Voltage source converters (VSCs), together with their inner current and outer power/voltage control loops, are fundamental building blocks in the modern, converter-dominated power systems, particularly within high-voltage DC (HVDC) frameworks. Selecting effective control methods for VSCs is essential to ensure the stability, power quality, and dynamic performance of HVDC grids. This paper seeks to advance the current body of research by delivering an in-depth, consistent, unified framework and systematic examination of VSC control architectures within HVDC networks. It thoroughly explores various control strategies for VSCs interfacing with HVDC grids, such as grid-following and grid-forming strategies, with particular emphasis on both stationary (αβ) and synchronous (dq) reference frames. Moreover, the paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the theoretical underpinnings and decoupled control strategies, like the feedforward decoupling of the d- and q-axis currents in the dq frame and the inherently decoupled structure of the αβ frame. Additionally, advanced filtering techniques, including Moving Average Filter (MAF), Cascaded Delayed Signal Cancellation (DSC), and LCL filters, are analyzed. In addition, harmonic mitigation strategies, like parallel/multiple resonant (PR) terms in the αβ frame and cascaded notch filters in the dq frame, are presented. Furthermore, precise power control approaches and synchronization methods are discussed in detail. Also, this paper presents a detailed comparison of the performance characteristics of phase-locked loop (PLL) and frequency-locked loop (FLL) in response to grid frequency variations. Moreover, this paper proposes circuit representations and VSC models in both synchronous and stationary reference frames. The simulation results corroborate the theoretical insights discussed in the paper under various operational conditions, including initial responses, grid disturbances, three-phase-to-ground temporary fault scenarios, harmonic distortions, and load imbalances, in terms of overshoot, settling time, active- and reactive-power fluctuation reduction, voltage unbalance factor, total harmonic distortion, and post-fault convergence time, all evaluated in accordance with the limits defined in EN-50160. This comprehensive comparison of the presented control strategies facilitates researchers in identifying the most appropriate controller depending on their specific application requirements.
Astereki et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: