Intravenous tirofiban treatment in progressive ischemic stroke yielded a mean NIHSS improvement of 3.4 in small-vessel occlusion versus 0.8 in large-vessel occlusion (p=0.048).
Does intravenous tirofiban improve clinical outcomes and maintain safety in patients with progressive ischemic stroke?
Intravenous tirofiban appears safe and may improve clinical outcomes in progressive ischemic stroke specifically caused by small-vessel occlusion, warranting further randomized trials.
Absolute Event Rate: 3.4% vs 0.8%
p-value: p=0.048
BACKGROUND: In an open pilot study, we studied the safety and efficacy of treatment with the nonpeptide glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist tirofiban in patients with progressive ischemic stroke. The rationale for the use of tirofiban in progressive stroke is the effect on vessel patency and microcircu lation. METHODS: Patients with acute ischemic stroke and progression of > or =2 points on the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) in the first 96 h after stroke onset were treated with intravenous tirofiban. Serial NIHSS measurements and intra- and extracerebral bleeding complications were recorded. RESULTS: Progressive stroke was observed in 35 patients with a mean progression of 5.4 (SD 4.1) points on the NIHSS. No severe bleeding complications occurred during tirofiban treatment. Analysis of variance revealed a significant interaction between stroke etiology (small-vessel vs. large-vessel occlusion) and NIHSS during treatment with tirofiban: patients with small-vessel occlusion showed significant improvement, while patients with large-vessel occlusion did not. The mean NIHSS improvement after tirofiban infusion was 3.4 (SD 3.4) for small-vessel occlusion versus 0.8 (SD 4.2) for large-vessel occlusion (p = 0.048). CONCLUSION: Treatment with tirofiban was well tolerated in patients with progressive stroke. However, only patients with small-vessel occlusion recovered significantly during infusion of tirofiban. The effect of tirofiban in progressive stroke and different subgroups of stroke deserves to be studied in a randomized controlled trial.
Philipps et al. (Thu,) conducted a other in Progressive ischemic stroke (n=35). Tirofiban was evaluated on Mean NIHSS improvement (small-vessel vs. large-vessel occlusion) (p=0.048). Intravenous tirofiban treatment in progressive ischemic stroke yielded a mean NIHSS improvement of 3.4 in small-vessel occlusion versus 0.8 in large-vessel occlusion (p=0.048).