Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
AIMS: The optimal antiplatelet regimen for branch atheromatous disease (BAD)-related stroke remains uncertain. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) vs. single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) in these patients. METHODS: From the multicenter prospective BAD-study, we collected consecutive patients with BAD who received DAPT and SAPT. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline characteristics. The primary efficacy endpoint was an excellent outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 1 at 90 days. The safety endpoint was bleeding events within 7 or 90 days. RESULTS: A total of 449 patients were enrolled in the analysis, with a median age of 60 years and a median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 3 at admission. After PSM, there were 112 patients in the SAPT group and 171 patients in the DAPT group, with well-balanced baseline characteristics. Excellent outcome occurred in 69.6% of the SAPT group and 79.5% of the DAPT group (odds ratio, 0.590; 95% confidence interval, 0.341 to 1.022; p = 0.059). No significant differences were observed in other efficacy outcomes between the two groups. In exploratory subgroup analysis, no significant treatment-by-subgroup interactions were observed, and after correction for multiple comparisons, no within-subgroup differences remained statistically significant. No increased bleeding risk was observed in DAPT. CONCLUSION: In acute BAD-related stroke, DAPT was safe but not statistically superior to SAPT for excellent functional outcome; however, its numerical trend toward benefit warrants further investigation.
Hu et al. (Tue,) studied this question.