Abstract Drawing on experimental and reverse-engineering approaches, this study situates algorithmic governance within the broader context of digital society and reflects on results of an experiment where multiple virtual accounts were constructed that engage in long-term, realistic interactions with digital platforms in order to penetrate the politicized “black box” of algorithms. It examines how algorithmic governance shapes the heterogeneity of information acquisition among users. Empirical findings reveal that in the digital era, algorithmic governance has become highly complex, sophisticated and concealed. At the information theme level, algorithms increase users’ exposure to diverse topical content. However, at the level of information semantics , algorithms reinforce the filter bubble effect, leading to the narrowing and enclosure of information flows. This study reveals how different individuals are situated by algorithms within relatively bounded positions in semantic vector spaces, and receive information confined to specific semantic dimensions.
Liu et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: