Abnormal heart rate turbulence (HRT2) was an independent predictor of poor prognosis in patients with chronic heart failure, associated with a significantly increased risk of heart failure deterioration or cardiac mortality (HR 4.68).
Cohort (n=134)
No
Do heart rate turbulence parameters predict mortality in patients with chronic heart failure?
Heart rate turbulence parameters, along with LVEF and heart rate variability metrics, are independent predictors of mortality in patients with chronic heart failure.
Hazard Ratio: 4.68 (95% CI 1.54–16.78)
p-value: p=0.030
BACKGROUND: This study is aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of heart rate turbulence (HRT) parameters in predicting the prognosis in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). METHODS: From June 2011 to December 2012, a total of 104 CHF patients and 30 healthy controls were enrolled in this study. We obtained a 24-hour Holter ECG recording to assess the HRT parameters, included turbulence onset (TO), turbulence slope (TS), standard deviation of N-N intervals (SDNN), and resting heart rate (RHR). The relationships between HRT parameters and the prognosis of CHF patients were determined. RESULTS: The assessment follow-up period lasted until January 31, 2013. The overall mortality of CHF patients was 9.6% (10/104). Our results revealed that CHF patients had higher levels of TO than those of healthy subjects, but the TS levels of CHF patients were lower than that of the control group. CHF patients with NYHA grade IV had higher HRT1/2 rate than those with NYHA grade II/III. There were statistical differences in TS, LVEF, SDNN and RHR between the non-deteriorating group and the non-survivor group. Significant differences in TS among the three groups were also found. Furthermore, CHF patients in the non-survivor group had lower levels of TS than those in the deteriorating group. Correlation analyses indicated that TO negatively correlate with SDNN, while TS positively correlated with SDNN and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We also observed negative correlations between TS and left ventricular end-diastolic cavity dimension (LVEDD), RHR, homocysteine (Hcy) and C-reactive protein (CRP). Multivariate Cox regression analysis further confirmed that LVEF (≤30%), HRT2, SDNN and RHR were independent risk factors which can indicate poor prognosis in CHF patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that HRT may have good clinical predictive value in patients with CHF. Thus, quantifying HRT parameters could be a useful tool for predicting mortality in CHF patients.
Yin et al. (Sun,) conducted a cohort in Chronic heart failure (n=134). Abnormal heart rate turbulence (HRT2) vs. Normal heart rate turbulence (HRT0) was evaluated on Composite of heart failure deterioration and cardiac mortality (HR 4.68, 95% CI 1.54-16.78, p=0.030). Abnormal heart rate turbulence (HRT2) was an independent predictor of poor prognosis in patients with chronic heart failure, associated with a significantly increased risk of heart failure deterioration or cardiac mortality (HR 4.68).