Abstract Galaxy mergers are a central driver of galaxy evolution across cosmic time, and thus, quantifying their frequency is critical for constraining hierarchical models of galaxy formation. Motivated by the need to robustly quantify these fractions and their evolution, we build on our previous close-pair analysis by exploring morphological identification techniques within the Deep Extragalactic VIsible Legacy Survey (DEVILS), using the D10 (COSMOS) field, which covers an area of 1.47 deg2. While close-pairs trace the early stages of galaxy interactions, morphological methods probe more advanced phases of the merging process, including systems with disturbed structures and post-merger remnants. We present galaxy merger fractions over the redshift range 0.2 z 0.9 using visual classification and automated identification based on non-parametric statistics: concentration (C), asymmetry (A), smoothness (S), Gini (G), and M20, applied to HST/ACS imaging. To enhance the detection of subtle structural perturbations, we measure asymmetry on unsharp-masked images. We find relatively little overlap between visually and automatically identified samples, which highlights their distinct sensitivities and limitations. Moreover, galaxy merger fractions derived from morphological disturbances are consistently higher than those from close-pair counts at all redshifts. This potentially reflects how each method probes different stages of the merger process, with distinct observability timescales, as well as the fact that morphologically disturbed galaxies, at a given redshift, are typically the later-stage descendants of close-pairs from earlier epochs. This comparison allows us to examine systematic differences between identification techniques and assess how they impact the observed evolution of the galaxy merger fraction.
Fuentealba-Fuentes et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: