Programme-level position paper. This document records the 2026 reframing of the Radial Coherential Dynamics (RCD) programme after a genealogical and adversarial audit. It states what was closed, what survived, and the reframed frontier question. It claims no new physics. The evidence is carried by two companion deposits: the genealogical-audit case study "From Substrate to Relational" (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21141602) and the MERIDIANO-v1 technical record with its reproducibility bundle (all versions: DOI 10.5281/zenodo.21142230). Four closures are registered with their instruments: (i) the coherence substrate lost operative physical status along three independent routes — buried as a physical claim, not refuted as a metaphysical possibility; (ii) the coupling rule J = J0·sqrt(Ci·Cj) was identified as an exact algebraic rewriting of a standard dispersive circuit-QED coupling; (iii) MERIDIANO-v1 returned INDETERMINATE-by-size at L = 12, after correcting a frictionless four-model NO-GO consensus (a documented instance of "cheap deflation"); (iv) the classical coupling of C to curvature remains closed by its own kill switch. What survives is labelled by epistemic status, including one falsifiable proprietary question — whether Wright–Fisher-class coupling landscapes carry a many-body fingerprint distinguishable from spectrum-matched surrogates — which cannot, in either outcome, promote C to a physical field. The centre of the programme is relocated from an ontological assertion to a frontier question with its own pre-declared death condition. No experiment is launched by this paper.
Arturo Cerezo (Fri,) studied this question.