The Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC) was established to drive regional development through interventions in critical sectors such as water scheme development and health care development. Despite decades of NDDC projects and programmers, many communities across the Niger Delta still experience limited access to reliable infrastructure and essential social services. This raises serious concerns about the extent to which NDDC interventions are translating into measurable socio-economic improvements. The main objective of this study was to examine the impact of NDDC on socio-economic development in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria. One of the specific objectives of the study was to examine the impact of NDDC on water scheme development in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria. Institution theory was adopted as the theoretical framework for the study. The study used both descriptive design and survey method. The study population was 56,079,185 which was the projected population of the people in the Niger Delta Region. The sample size of the study was 384. Stratified and simple random sampling techniques were adopted in the study. The data collected from primary and secondary sources were analyzed using simple regression analysis with SPSS statistical tool. The study revealed that there is no significant impact of the NDDC on water scheme development in the Niger Delta Region. The study also revealed that there is a positive and insignificant impact of the NDDC on health care development in the Niger Delta Region. The study therefore recommended that; NDDC should raise investment in potable water (boreholes, water treatment, reticulation) especially in underserved LGAs, and ensure sustainability by setting up/ training local water-user committees, providing maintenance funding models, and integrating water schemes into WASH and primary healthcare goals in the Niger Delta Region. NDDC should shift emphasis toward operational effectiveness by equipping facilities, support solar power/water supply for clinics, partner with state health ministries for staffing, and monitor key service indicators (maternal care, immunization, disease reduction) to confirm real impact in the region.
ThankGod et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: