Obtaining accurate information on demographic states, such as the age and sex classes of animals, is an important step for monitoring wildlife populations. Traditionally, demographic data are collected from harvest, aerial surveys and telemetry studies. However, these methods can be expensive, limited to small spatial scales, or biased due to human behavior. Remote cameras have become a mainstay for studying and monitoring wildlife as they are relatively inexpensive, can be deployed over large spatial scales, and effort can be accounted for during surveys. For some species, a variety of demographic information, such as sex and age classes, can be obtained from pictures. Moose Alces alces are a photogenic species found across boreal and semi‐boreal forests of the Northern Hemisphere. Previous studies have used demographic data from remote cameras to estimate demographic parameters and population dynamics. A primary assumption is that these age and sex classes are accurately classified. However, numerous factors can influence the ability of observers to identify age and sex classes of moose captured on cameras. We used data from 84 cameras from a 3‐year period (2021–2024) in northern Maine, USA, to evaluate how temporal, environmental, site‐level, and endogenous factors influence observers' ability to classify age and sex classes of moose. Using Bayesian categorical regression models, we found that temporal variability, position and proximity of moose from cameras, and the behavior of moose influenced our ability to identify age and sex classes. This information can be used to decide which periods to use data for population modeling and how to design studies to reduce the amount of uncertainty associated with different age and sex classes. We anticipate that our approach could also be used for other species whose age and sex classes can be differentiated using remote cameras.
Sirén et al. (Thu,) studied this question.