Community Group Saving and Lending (CGSL) mechanisms are commonly evaluated through their contribution to agricultural inputs, productivity and market-oriented production. In rural South Sudan, however, the same loan pools also finance child schooling, health treatment, transport to clinics, food smoothing and other household obligations that are not strictly agricultural but remain central to rural development. This article re-analyses evidence from a mixed-methods study of CGSL mechanisms in Eastern Equatoria, Jonglei and Lakes States, with particular attention to the development implications of non-agricultural loan uses. The original study drew on 85 targeted respondents, 81 valid survey responses and 17 qualitative interviews, and found that CGSL participation was significantly associated with improved agricultural productivity and technology adoption. This paper extends the analysis by arguing that education and health-related borrowing should not be dismissed as consumption leakage. Rather, these uses can protect human capital, prevent asset depletion, stabilise labour availability and strengthen the household capacity required for agricultural investment. The paper develops a human-capital protection framework, a loan-use portfolio matrix and policy pathways for aligning education, health and farm-finance functions within CGSL design. The findings suggest that CGSLs perform best when they are allowed to operate as integrated livelihood-finance institutions rather than narrow agricultural credit instruments. Keywords: CGSL; child schooling; health expenditure; rural finance; human capital; agricultural development; South Sudan; savings groups.
Toch et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: