Reports of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) often pose interpretive challenges that extend beyond identifying physical objects. While many sightings can be explained by misidentification or observational error, a subset of encounters, described as high-strangeness, combines physical observations with perceptual anomalies, symbolic elements, and seemingly contradictory features. Such encounters frequently resist stabilisation within conventional explanatory frameworks. This article examines Jacques Vallée’s control-system hypothesis as a framework for understanding these interpretive difficulties. Drawing on concepts from cybernetics and systems theory, the control-system hypothesis proposes that anomalous encounters may operate as informational disturbances that interact with broader systems of perception, belief, and cultural interpretation. Within this perspective, the seemingly absurd elements reported in many encounters become analytically significant rather than incidental narrative detail. By examining how these features challenge existing interpretive structures, the article argues that absurdity may function as an indicator of the limits of conventional explanatory models in UAP research. Vallée’s framework therefore provides a useful conceptual orientation for analysing high-strangeness encounters that appear to operate simultaneously across physical, experiential, and symbolic domains.
Michaela Heidi Robson (Sun,) studied this question.