Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
We present the results, experiences, and lessons learned from comparing a diverse set of indoor location technologies during the Microsoft Indoor Localization Competition. Over the last four years (2014-2017), more than 100 teams from academia and industry deployed their indoor location solutions in realistic, unfamiliar environments, allowing us to directly compare their accuracies and overhead. In this article, we provide an analysis of this four-year-long evaluation study's results and discuss the current state of the art in indoor localization.
Lymberopoulos et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: