Obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy was associated with significantly higher 1-year total healthcare costs compared with matched controls ($26,929 vs. $6,808, p<.001).
Cohort (n=45,604)
Does obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy increase healthcare resource utilization and costs compared to matched controls?
Obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy imposes a substantial clinical and economic burden, particularly among symptomatic patients, highlighting the need for effective therapies to reduce healthcare resource utilization.
Absolute Event Rate: 26929% vs 6808%
p-value: p=<.001
Aims Obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM) is a disease of the cardiomyocyte in which dynamic left ventricular outflow track obstruction may lead to heart failure, valvular disease, and sudden death. Little is known about healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs associated with oHCM. This study investigated the clinical and economic burden of oHCM in patients with or without symptoms associated with oHCM. Methods We used the US IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental database to identify patients with oHCM (January 2009–March 2019). Control patients without cardiomyopathy were matched to each patient with oHCM based on age, sex, region, and index year (3: 1 ratio). One-year HRU and cost data were compared between all oHCM, symptomatic oHCM, and asymptomatic oHCM subgroups, and their respective controls. Results Among 11, 401 eligible patients with oHCM (mean age 57 years, 42% female), 5, 667 (50%) were symptomatic (23% chest pain, 57% dyspnea, 29% fatigue, 17% syncope). oHCM was associated with significant increases in all-cause hospitalizations, hospital days, outpatient visits, and total healthcare costs (mean ± standard deviation: 26, 929 ± 77, 720 vs. 6, 808 ± 25, 712, p<. 001) compared with matched controls. These differences were driven mainly by the clinical and economic burden of symptomatic oHCM, which was associated with significant increases in 1-year hospitalization rates (38. 0 vs. 6. 9%), hospital days (3. 7 ± 9. 9 vs. 0. 4 ± 3. 0), and total healthcare costs (43, 586 ± 103, 756 vs. 6, 768 ± 27, 618; all p<. 001). Adjustment for comorbidities had minimal impact on these differences. Limitations The use of claims data relies on International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9 and ICD-10) diagnosis codes, which might be inaccurate. Only commercially insured patients were included. Conclusion In a real-world population, oHCM was associated with substantial increases in HRU and incremental costs of ∼20, 000/year when compared with matched controls—a difference that increased to ∼35, 000/year among symptomatic patients. Further studies are warranted to understand the potential impact of specific therapies on HRU and the economic burden of oHCM.
Jain et al. (Fri,) conducted a cohort in Obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n=45,604). Obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy vs. Matched controls without cardiomyopathy was evaluated on 1-year total healthcare costs (p=<.001). Obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy was associated with significantly higher 1-year total healthcare costs compared with matched controls ($26,929 vs. $6,808, p<.001).