The PARALLEL-HF study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan versus enalapril on cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization in 220 Japanese patients with HFrEF.
RCT (n=220)
Double-blind
1:1
Yes
Does sacubitril/valsartan reduce the composite of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization compared to enalapril in Japanese patients with HFrEF?
The PARALLEL-HF study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan versus enalapril in Japanese patients with HFrEF to support local regulatory approval.
BACKGROUND: The prognosis of heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in Japan remains poor, although there is growing evidence for increasing use of evidence-based pharmacotherapies in Japanese real-world HF registries. Sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) is a first-in-class angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor shown to reduce mortality and morbidity in the recently completed largest outcome trial in patients with HFrEF (PARADIGM-HF trial). The prospectively designed phase III PARALLEL-HF (Prospective comparison of ARNI with ACE inhibitor to determine the noveL beneficiaL trEatment vaLue in Japanese Heart Failure patients) study aims to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of LCZ696 in Japanese HFrEF patients, and show similar improvements in clinical outcomes as the PARADIGM-HF study enabling the registration of LCZ696 in Japan. METHODS AND DESIGN: This is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, active controlled study of 220 Japanese HFrEF patients. Eligibility criteria include a diagnosis of chronic HF (New York Heart Association Class II-IV) and reduced ejection fraction (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%) and increased plasma concentrations of natriuretic peptides N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) ≥600pg/mL, or NT-proBNP ≥400pg/mL for those who had a hospitalization for HF within the last 12 months at the screening visit. The study consists of three phases: (i) screening, (ii) single-blind active LCZ696 run-in, and (iii) double-blind randomized treatment. Patients tolerating LCZ696 50mg bid during the treatment run-in are randomized (1:1) to receive LCZ696 100mg bid or enalapril 5mg bid for 4 weeks followed by up-titration to target doses of LCZ696 200mg bid or enalapril 10mg bid in a double-blind manner. The primary outcome is the composite of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization and the study is an event-driven trial. CONCLUSIONS: The design of the PARALLEL-HF study is aligned with the PARADIGM-HF study and aims to assess the efficacy and safety of LCZ696 in Japanese HFrEF patients.
Tsutsui et al. (Sat,) conducted a rct in Chronic heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=220). Sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) vs. Enalapril 5mg bid up-titrated to 10mg bid was evaluated on Composite of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization. The PARALLEL-HF study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan versus enalapril on cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization in 220 Japanese patients with HFrEF.