Contrast-enhanced SSFP cine CMR accurately quantified myocardium at risk compared to myocardial perfusion SPECT in a porcine model of acute myocardial infarction (bias 1 ± 3% LVM, r2=0.92).
Does contrast-enhanced SSFP cine CMR accurately quantify myocardium at risk compared to MPS in an experimental porcine model of acute myocardial infarction?
Contrast-enhanced SSFP cine CMR accurately quantifies myocardium at risk in an experimental AMI model and remains stable for 30 minutes, validating its use for assessing myocardial salvage.
Mean Difference: 1
Absolute Event Rate: 29% vs 30%
p-value: p=<0.001
BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of myocardium at risk (MaR) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is necessary when assessing myocardial salvage. Contrast-enhanced steady-state free precession (CE-SSFP) is a recently developed cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) method for assessment of MaR up to 1 week after AMI. Our aim was to validate CE-SSFP for determination of MaR in an experimental porcine model using myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (MPS) as a reference standard and to test the stability of MaR-quantification over time after injecting gadolinium-based contrast. METHODS: Eleven pigs were subjected to either 35 or 40 min occlusion of the left anterior descending artery followed by six hours of reperfusion. A technetium-based perfusion tracer was administered intravenously ten minutes before reperfusion. In-vivo and ex-vivo CE-SSFP CMR was performed followed by ex-vivo MPS imaging. MaR was expressed as % of left ventricular mass (LVM). RESULTS: = 0.87, p < 0.001. No change in MaR was seen over the first 30 min after contrast injection (p = 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Contrast-enhanced SSFP cine CMR can be used to measure MaR, both in vivo and ex vivo, in a porcine model with good accuracy and precision over the first 30 min after contrast injection. This offers the option to use the less complex ex-vivo imaging when determining myocardial salvage in experimental studies.
Nordlund et al. (2016) studied Acute myocardial infarction (n=12). Contrast-enhanced SSFP cine CMR vs. Myocardial perfusion SPECT (MPS) was evaluated on Agreement between myocardium at risk (MaR) by ex-vivo CE-SSFP and MaR by MPS (bias 1 ± 3% LVM, p=<0.001). Contrast-enhanced SSFP cine CMR accurately quantified myocardium at risk compared to myocardial perfusion SPECT in a porcine model of acute myocardial infarction (bias 1 ± 3% LVM, r2=0.92).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: