Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
As an antihypertensive regimen, angiotensin I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition appears to have an antiproliferative cardiovascular effect that is not caused by blood pressure reduction alone. On the other hand, ACE inhibition has been shown to induce neocapillarization in hypertrophied myocardium. The possible mechanisms behind these beneficial cardiovascular effects of ACE inhibition are the suppression of angiotensin II formation and the potentiation of bradykinin. Angiotensin II receptor antagonism appears to have a similar antiproliferative effect on myocardium and vascular smooth muscle as ACE inhibition. This suggests that the antiproliferative action of both regimens is due only to the reduction of the pressor and growth effects of angiotensin II, or that both regimens have an additional, similarly effective antiproliferative action. Recently, knowledge about angiotensin II receptors has almost exponentially expanded. The two main classes of angiotensin II receptors, type 1 and 2 (AT1 and AT2), have been shown to belong to the same receptor family. However, their signal transduction and function seem to differ totally. The function and signal transduction of AT1 are to a large extent known. All the well-known physiological and pathophysiological effects of angiotensin II have been attributed to AT1. On the other hand, AT2 has quite recently been shown to mediate antiproliferation and differentiation at least in some tissues and cells, e.g. in vascular endothelial cells and some cells of neuronal origin. This review highlights the recent findings on angiotensin II receptors, and discusses the mechanisms behind the beneficial cardiovascular effects of interfering with the renin-angiotensin system.
Stoll et al. (1997) studied this question.