The meaning and implications of resistance, as one of the core elements of Iran's foreign policy, have evolved in the course of time, due to the interplay of internal dynamics and external pressures. One may see a transition from overt radicalism to a more strategic approach, exhibiting cyclical fluctuations while maintaining core themes of anti-imperialism and anti-hegemony. Over time, the adoption of concepts such as 'dignity, wisdom, and expediency' and 'heroic flexibility' have allowed tactical adaptability. The focus of resistance has expanded from solely targeting American hegemony to promoting multipolarity and seeking regional leadership. Influenced by domestic politics and international developments, this concept serves to maintain domestic support, shape international image, and create diplomatic space. Employing discourse analysis and a genealogical method, this study examines the historical evolution of Iran's resistance discourse, revealing a shift from rigid ideology to a more dynamic, multifaceted strategy that reflects Iran's efforts to balance revolutionary ideals with pragmatic engagement in a complex global context.
Wu et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: