Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
The article examines the transformation and trends in the development of state property institutions in Russia, starting from the privatization of state assets in the 1990s of the last century to the present. The importance of the transition from state to joint-stock and private ownership from the position of choosing optimal forms of ownership in the formation of effective market mechanisms is noted. The specific and distinctive features of the development of property relations in the Russian Federation, the factors influencing the renewal of property institutions and changes in the management system of the state property are identified, since property forms the basis of all economic systems, is a basic economic relationship, has many properties, parameters and qualities, and each new form of ownership creates new public institutions. Conceptual approaches to the content of property and models of state property management in accordance with the tasks to be solved are investigated. The author's interpretation of methodological approaches to the formation of a mechanism for managing state property is presented, which is based on the cyclical development of property relations and the need for an optimal combination of ownership forms. The State, recognizing the expediency of switching to the use of market instruments in property management, in practice monitors the effective and targeted use of problematic, strategically important industrial assets that ensure the country's defense capability. It is concluded that in the context of modern changes in global management systems, there is an interconnected modification of both property relations and corporate relations. The ongoing processes are the result of changes in the internal and external business environment, organically included in the overall picture of global socio-economic transformations. It is noted that state assets transferred to private ownership are not managed efficiently enough. A well-organized mechanism for managing state property will allow us to build a pragmatic balance between market instruments and maintaining the levers of state influence on the development of all sectors of the national economy
Danilova et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: