Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
Abstract Background and Aims In patients with de novo heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is expected to occur when started on guideline-recommended medical therapy. However, improvement may not be completed within 90 days. Methods Patients with HFrEF and LVEF ≤ 35% prescribed a wearable cardioverter-defibrillator between 2017 and 2022 from 68 sites were enrolled, starting with a registry phase for 3 months and followed by a study phase up to 1 year. The primary endpoints were LVEF improvement 35% between Days 90 and 180 following guideline-recommended medical therapy initiation and the percentage of target dose reached at Days 90 and 180. Results A total of 598 patients with de novo HFrEF 59 years (interquartile range 51–68), 27% female entered the study phase. During the first 180 days, a significant increase in dosage of beta-blockers, renin–angiotensin system inhibitors, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists was observed (P .001). At Day 90, 46% 95% confidence interval (CI) 41%–50% of study phase patients had LVEF improvement 35%; 46% (95% CI 40%–52%) of those with persistently low LVEF at Day 90 had LVEF improvement 35% by Day 180, increasing the total rate of improvement 35% to 68% (95% CI 63%–72%). In 392 patients followed for 360 days, improvement 35% was observed in 77% (95% CI 72%–81%) of the patients. Until Day 90, sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias were observed in 24 wearable cardioverter-defibrillator carriers (1.8%). After 90 days, no sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia occurred in wearable cardioverter-defibrillator carriers. Conclusions Continuous optimization of guideline-recommended medical therapy for at least 180 days in HFrEF is associated with additional LVEF improvement 35%, allowing for better decision-making regarding preventive implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy.
Veltmann et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: